关键词：
网络购物
格式条款
管辖
摘要：
网络购物平台基于自身利益及安全保障的考量,普遍采用格式条款与消费者预先确定管辖法院的做法。尽管这种做法在一定程度上提升了网络消费纠纷的处理效率,但同时也实质上限制了消费者的管辖选择权。消费领域中,经营者制定协议管辖的格式条款是否属于不公平、不合理的规定,如何认定合理提示义务,这两个问题在理论和司法实践中均存在争议。对于管辖格式条款应坚持从内容和形式上进行实质审查,形成统一的裁判标准。Based on their own interests and security considerations, online shopping platforms generally adopt format terms and consumers’ predetermined jurisdiction courts. Although this approach has improved the processing efficiency of online consumption disputes to a certain extent, it also essentially limits the consumer’s jurisdictional choice. In the field of consumption, whether the standard terms formulated by the operator under the jurisdiction of the agreement belong to unfair and unreasonable provisions, and how to determine the reasonable prompt obligation, these two issues are controversial in theory and judicial practice. For the standard terms of jurisdiction, substantive examination should be carried out in terms of content and form to form a unified judgment standard.
